Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajiv Joshi, Judicial Member, Anjani Nandan Sharan, Administrative Member
Dinesh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Government of India through Secretary, Ministry of Youth Affairs & Sports – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. disciplinary proceedings timeline and penalty imposition (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. respondents' justification of inquiry and cvc advice (Para 4) |
| 3. applicant's challenge to non-consideration of representation (Para 7) |
| 4. respondents' defense of procedural compliance (Para 8) |
| 5. disciplinary authority must consider representation under rule 15 (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. impugned orders quashed with consequential benefits (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
O R D E R
By Justice Rajiv Joshi, Member (Judicial):-
Heard Shri S.K. Shukla assisted by Shri A.P. Singh, learned counsels for the applicant and Shri Raj Pal Singh, learned counsel for the respondents at the time of hearing of the case.
2. The instant Original Application under Section 19 of the Central Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 has been filed for the following reliefs:-
8.(i) Allow the original application by setting aside the order dated 04.06.2021 passed by respondent-3/Appellate Authority to the extant by which minor penalty of withholding of two increments for two years have been accorded to the applicant and also to quash the order dated 10.12.2020 passed by respondent-4 and further be directed to the respo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
