SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 4832

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajinder Singh Dogra, J, Ram Mohan Johri, Administrative Member
Owais Kamran Nazki – Appellant
Versus
UT of Jammu and Kashmir – Respondent
O.A. No. 975/2020



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Kanavdeep Singh Puri
For the Respondents: Sudesh Magotra

A candidate not included in a final select list has no enforceable right to appointment solely due to an unfilled vacancy caused by a selected candidate’s non-joining, in the absence of a specific statutory provision or a validly operating waiting list.

Headnote:(A) Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - S. 19 - Jammu and Kashmir Reservation Rules, 2005 - Rule 4 - Public Recruitment - Non-joining of selected candidate - Whether candidate next in merit has an enforceable legal right to appointment - Held, a candidate not in final select list acquires no vested right - Unfilled vacancy does not automatically confer right to appointment unless governing rules provide for waiting list - Judicial review is limited to checking illegality or arbitrariness.

Table of Content
1. case facts: applicant seeks appointment to a post due to non-joining by a selected candidate. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. the applicant relies on horizontal reservation and provisional shortlisting to claim appointment to an unfilled vacancy. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. parties' contentions regarding the existence of an enforceable right to be appointed based on merit position. (Para 9 , 10)
4. a candidate has no vested right to appointment without a validly operating waiting list established by rules. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
5. dismissal of o.a. due to absence of statutory provision or legal right for the applicant's claim. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)

ORDER

Per: - Ram Mohan Johri, Administrative Member

1. The applicant has filed the present Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following reliefs: -

a) The respondents may be directed to recommend and appoint the applicant as Store Keeper-Cum-Record Keeper-Cum-Clerk-CumComputer operator in GMC, Baramulla against the vacant post under Ex-Servicemen Category which has fallen vacant due to non-joining and double selection of Ajaz Ahmad Dar S/o S/o Nazir Ahmad Dar R/o Talangam Pulwama Tehsil & District Pulwama Kashmir.

b) That Hon'ble tribunal may kindly quash and set aside the impugned order No. 240 SSB of 2020 dated 21.09.2020 which is erroneous and against law.

c) This tribunal may pass any other order(s) or grant any other relief(s) which it deems fit and proper, in the facts and circumstances of this case in favour of the applicant and against the respondents.

2. The facts of the case as averred by the applicant in his pleadings, are as follows: -

a) The applicant, an Ex-Serviceman, has filed the present Original Application seeking a direction to the respondents to recommend and appoint him against the post of Store Keeper-cum-Record Keeper-cum-Clerk-cum-Computer Operator in Government Medical College, Baramulla, under the Ex-Servicemen category, on the ground that one of the selected candidates, namely Ajaz Ahmad Dar, though selected for GMC, Baramulla, did not join there as he had also been selected in GMC, Anantnag. The applicant has also challenged order No. 240 SSB of 2020 dated 21.09.2020, whereby his claim was rejected.

b) The case of the applicant is that pursuant to Advertisement Notice No. 02/2019/001 to 02/2019/041 dated 01.02.2019, issued by respondent No. 3 for various posts in Government Medical Colleges of Divisional Cadre Kashmir, 53 posts of Store Keeper-cum-Record Keeper-cum-Clerk-cum-Computer Operator were advertised for GMC, Baramulla under Item No. 02/2019/033. The applicant, being eligible and belonging to the Ex-Servicemen category, applied for the said post within time. According to him, in terms of Rule 4 of the Jammu and Kashmir Reservation Rules, 2005 , 6% horizontal reservation is available for Ex-Servicemen and, accordingly, out of 53 advertised posts, 3 posts were required to be filled from the said category.

c) It is further pleaded that respondent No. 3 issued a provisional shortlist for counselling and document verification on 26.07.2019. In the said shortlist, four candidates were shown in the Ex-Servicemen category and the applicant figured at Serial No. 4 in OM/ESM. One Ajaz Ahmad Dar, with the same roll number, was shown at Serial No. 2 in the Ex-Servicemen category for GMC, Baramulla and, according to the applicant, the same candidate also figured at Serial No. 2 in the Ex-Servicemen category for GMC, Anantnag. On noticing this, the applicant submitted a representation dated 14.12.2019 to the Chairman, J&K Services Selection Board, asserting that if Ajaz Ahmad Dar joined at GMC, Anantnag and did not join at GMC, Baramulla, the resultant vacancy in GMC, Baramulla ought to be offered to the next eligible Ex-Serviceman candidate, namely the applicant.

d) The applicant further states that thereafter the select list for 53 candidates was issued for GMC, Baramulla and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top