Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Umesh Gajankush, Judicial Member
Sanjay Lankeshwar Dhargawe – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges to transfer violating tenure, collegium, and spouse policy. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. transfer justified by public interest, vacancy, and precedents. (Para 3) |
| 3. collegium minutes incomplete, challenging procedure. (Para 4) |
| 4. public interest overrides tenure and spouse norms per clause 11. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. no arbitrariness; oa dismissed. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
ORDER
1.The present OA has been filed by the applicant challenging impugned transfer order dated 01.08.2025 Annexure A-1 ( ) by which he has been transferred from GSI, CR, RHQ, Nagpur to GSI, CR, State Unit:Chhattisgarh, Raipur. The applicant is also challenging impugned communication dated 12.08.2025 Annexure A-1(A)) ( by which the representation of the applicant has been rejected.
2. It is the case of the applicant that impugned transfer order is in gross violation of transfer policy of the department and also in gross violation of DoPT OM dated 30.09.2009 which pertains to spouse posting.
It is submitted that vide order dated 24.12.2024 Annexure A-2 ( ), the applicant was promoted to the post of Administrative officer (Group B, Non Gazetted) and after promotion, he was posted at RHQ, CR, Nagpur. It is
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
