Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Harvinder Kaur Oberoi, Judicial Member, Sumeet Jerath, Administrative Member
Anita Jain – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's appointment, promotion delay, and grievance (Para 1 , 2 , 7) |
| 2. steno grade d (urdu) ineligible for promotion to grade c (Para 3 , 4 , 8 , 9 , 12 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 33) |
| 3. respondents' failure to address representations and delay (Para 5 , 6 , 10 , 11 , 31 , 32) |
| 4. promotion based on combined seniority list and common rules (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 17 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. rejoinder denying seniority and rules misapplication (Para 29 , 30 , 34) |
| 6. seniority finality upholds promotion validity (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 7. original application dismissed (Para 44) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Ms. Harvinder Kaur Oberoi, Member (J):
1.By way of filing this Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act,1985, the applicant has sought the following reliefs:-
“(a) Direct the Respondent(s) to set aside the impugned order/Office Memorandum No.F2-1/2020-Estt. Dt.19- 08-2020 in respect of promotion of Mohd. Yousuf Steno Grade ‘D’ (Urdu) to Steno Grade ‘C’, after complete review of the process of Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC).
(b) Direct the Respondent(s) to grant/award promotion to the Applicant (Ms. Anita Jain) as Ste
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
