SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 4856

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
422/2026


CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK Order Sheet Item no.: 18 No of Adjournment: 1 O.A./173/2026 (CUTTACK)

[ TRANSFER ]

Order Dated: 09/04/2026 Court No.: 1 RAJEEV KUMAR TRIPATHY Vs CENTRAL GROUND WATER BOARD For Applicant(s) Advocate : S B Jena For Respondent(s) Advocate : A K Mohapatra

4. It is within the exclusive domain of the employer to determine as to at what place and for how long the services of a particular employee are required.

5. Transfer order should be passed in public interest or administrative exigency, and not arbitrarily or for extraneous consideration or for victimization of the employee nor it should be passed under political pressure.

6. There is very little scope of judicial review by Courts/Tribunals against the transfer order and the same is restricted only if the transfer order is found to be in contravention of the statutory Rules or mala fides are established.

7. In case of mala fides, the employee has to make specific averments and should prove the same by adducing impeccable evidence.

8. The person against whom allegations of mala fide is made should be impleaded as a party by name.

9. Transfer policy or guidelines issued by the State or employer does not h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top