G.Subbulakshmi vs Union of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M. Swaminathan, Judicial Member, M.L. Srivastava, Administrative Member
G.Subbulakshmi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M/s P. Ayyamperumal
For the Respondents: Mr. M. Kishore Kumar, SPC

Table of Content
1. applicant's reliefs and career facts (Para 1 , 2)
2. precedents support pay w.e.f. 01.01.1996 (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
3. oa barred by limitation and laches (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
4. anomaly committee history and parity (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
5. judgments in rem for similarly situated (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37)
6. notional pay from 1996, actual from 2004 (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41)

(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. M. L. Srivastava, Member(A))

In the instant OA, the applicant seek the following relief:

“(A) to call for records and proceedings of the case which led to the passing of the orders i.e. (i) Office Memorandum in File No.6/37/98-IC dated 21.04.2004 i.e.Annexure-A1 and (ii) Office Memorandum in File No.A-26017/65/2003- Ad.II-A(Pt) dated 11.05.2004 i.e. Annexure A2, its subsequent (latest) Office Memorandum in File No.A- 26017/65/2003-Ad.II-A(Pt) dated 25.07.2023 i.e. Annexure A3, (iii). against the communication dated 14.08.2025 (F.No. Nil) of the 5th respondent. (Annexure- A5) and after going through their propriety, legality and constitutional validity be pleased to quash and set as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALM. Swaminathan, Judicial Member, M.L. Srivastava, Administrative MemberG.Subbulakshmi – AppellantVersusUnion of India – Respondent

Cases Referred (3)

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M. Swaminathan, Judicial Member, M.L. Srivastava, Administrative Member
G.Subbulakshmi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent