R. Bhavani vs Union of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M. SWAMINATHAN, Judicial Member, M.L. SRIVASTAVA, Administrative Member
R. Bhavani – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Thirumalai Rajagopal
For the Respondents: Mr. J. Vasu

Table of Content
1. applicant's claim for revised pay scales from 01.01.1996. (Para 1 , 2)
2. precedents and judgments supporting retrospective pay benefits. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
3. respondents' defense on limitation, laches, and personam judgments. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
4. historical litigation and anomaly committee recommendations. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
5. article 14 equality for similarly situated employees. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37)
6. notional pay from 1996, actual benefits from 2004. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41)

ORAL ORDER

(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. M. L. Srivastava, Member(A))

1.In the instant OA, the applicant seek the following relief:

“(i) To call for the records of the Respondents and to set aside the Letter No. GCCO/II/39/54/2022-CCA Estt dated 29.08.2023 passed by 1^st respondent and declare that the Applicant herein is entitled to the benefits of revised/ replaced pay scale/ upgraded pay scale of Rs. 6500-10500 for the period he was working as Inspector of Central Excise and of Rs.7500-12000 in respect of his service as Superintendents of Central Excise/Customs with effect from 1.1.1996

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALM. SWAMINATHAN, Judicial Member, M.L. SRIVASTAVA, Administrative MemberR. Bhavani – AppellantVersusUnion of India – Respondent

Cases Referred (4)

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M. SWAMINATHAN, Judicial Member, M.L. SRIVASTAVA, Administrative Member
R. Bhavani – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent