Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Chhabilendra Roul, Member (A), Rajveer Singh Verma, Member (J)
Indra Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicants claim seniority-based grade pay parity with junior. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. parties argue on stepping up applicability under acp/macp. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. fr 22 governs pay fixation on promotion with options. (Para 6) |
| 4. conditions not met; oa lacks merit, dismissed. (Para 7) |
By Dr. Chhabilendra Roul, Member (A)
The present Original Application has been filed by eight applicants under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following relief:
“(a) direct the respondents to pay the applicants G.P. Rs.4600/- from the date when juniors to the applicants were given;
(b) pass any other order or orders as deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the applicant.”
2. Factual Matrix
2.1 The present applicants are claiming that they were senior to Respondent No. 4, namely Shri Ranvir Singh, Record Supplier with the respondents. The applicants have not furnished, in their pleadings, the copies of all the initial appointment letters. They have only furnished the initial appointment letter of Applicant No.1 (Annexure- 2) according to which he was appointed on 18.05.1979 as Messenger boy. However, from th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
