Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M. Swaminathan, Judicial Member, M. L. Srivastava, Administrative Member
A. Muthukrishnan – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of pay scale anomaly from 5th cpc. (Para 2 , 22 , 25) |
| 2. precedents grant notional pay w.e.f. 01.01.1996. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 3. respondents argue delay and personam judgments. (Para 13 , 14 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. parity under art.14; recurring cause overrides delay. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 5. notional from 1996, actual from 2004; oa allowed. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. M. L. Srivastava, Administrative Member)
This OA has been filed by the applicant seeking the following relief:
(i) To call for the records of the respondents and to declare that the applicant herein is entitled to the benefits of revised pay scale with effect from 01.01.1996 on actual basis, i.e., from the date when the 5th CPV became operational, based on the judgements/decisions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court and various High Courts and Tribunals (ii) To set aside/quash the speaking order in File No. GCCO/III/24/51/2025, CAO - O/o Pr.CC-CGST- Zone-Chennai, dated 12.08.2025 of the Principal Chief Commissioner of GT & Central Excise, TN &
Puducherry, Chennai (iii) To direct the respondents to grant benefits of revised pay and al
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
