Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Lata Baswaraj Patne, Judicial Member, Varun Sindhu Kul Kaumudi, Administrative Member
CH.V. Ramana – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details charges of financial misappropriation in postal accounts. (Para 2) |
| 2. applicant's procedural objections versus respondents' defense of inquiry fairness. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. distinction between criminal acquittal and departmental proceedings. (Para 5 , 7 , 11) |
| 4. oa barred by limitation and non-exhaustion of remedies. (Para 6 , 12) |
| 5. dilatory tactics rejected; dismissal proportionate for public fund breach. (Para 9 , 10 , 13 , 14) |
ORAL ORDER
(As per Hon’ble Mr. Varun Sindhu Kul Kaumudi, Administrative Member)
By this Original Application, the applicant sought the following relief:
“……to quash and set aside appellate order vide Memo No. ST- IV/13/20/2017 Dated 06-07-2018 and Memo No. F 4- 3/TGM/2009-10/Vol.v Dated 17-07-2017 by the 4th respondent imposing the harsh punishment of Dismissal being illegal, harsh, arbitrary and disproportionate punishment and reinstate the applicant with all consequential benefits and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”
2. Facts, in brief, according to the applicant, are given below:
i. The applicant was appointed as a Postal Assistant, on 06.12.1981, in Tadepal
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
