Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Manish Garg, Member (J), Rajinder Kashyap, Member (A)
Shivdesh Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of NCT of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. respondents argue ews quota calculated from current vacancies excluding backlog. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. applicants contend improper ews quota allocation violates article 14 equality. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. applicants rebut with precedents favoring full 10% ews on total vacancies. (Para 5) |
| 4. court frames issue on correct ews policy implementation in advertisement. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. backlog vacancies excluded from ews computation per article 16(4b). (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. applicants' precedents inapplicable due to factual distinctions. (Para 15) |
| 7. late challenge after participation without protest barred. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 8. ews reservation correctly applied; oa dismissed. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, Member (A):
By filing the present OA under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicants are seeking the following reliefs:-
"(a) the Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to direct the respondents to adhere to the EWS reservation policy of the Govt. and to implement it fully by providing for the entire quantum of 10% EWS reservation and thereby provide 70 or 71 vacancies (as the case may be) towards the EWS category for the pos
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
