Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Chhabilendra Roul, Member (A), Rajveer Singh Verma, Member (J)
Akash Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Controller General of Patents, Designs & Trade Marks (CGPDTM) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to transfer violating spousal and medical policy. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. interim stay opposed citing administrative prerogative. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. mechanical rejections require reasoned consideration. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. quash orders; direct fresh reasoned review. (Para 14) |
ORDER (ORAL)
1. The present OA has been filed by the applicant under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 seeking the following relief:
“ (a) Quash and set aside the rejection orders dated 17.02.2026 and 08.04.2026, whereby the representations submitted by the Applicant has been transferred from Delhi to Chennai being arbitrary, non –speaking and in violation of the revised transfer policy dated 04.07.2025 (b) Quash and set aside the rejection orders dated 08.04.2026, whereby the representations submitted by the applicant on compelling medical grounds have been mechanically rejected without recording any reasons and without due consideration of the medical evidence;
(c) Direct the Respondents to retain the Applicant at his present place of posting at Delhi, or in the alternative, to consider his case for posting at a medically suitable location in accordanc
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
