Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Ajay Pratap Singh, Member (J), Rajinder Kashyap, Member (A)
Rakesh Kumar Sinha – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's appointment, removal, reinstatement chronology (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. procedural lapses in enquiry report service (Para 4 , 6) |
| 3. respondents justify removal for unauthorized absence (Para 5) |
| 4. period treated as eol per service book (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. no interference absent perversity; no work no pay (Para 12 , 17) |
| 6. oa dismissed; no merit in claims (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
ORDER
1.Hon’ble Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, Member (A): By filing the present O.A. under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicant has sought the following reliefs: -
"a. To quashed the impugned undated order, which is passed in compliance of the order dated 20.10.2023 passed in OA No. 959/2018 Rakesh Kumar Sinha Vs. Union of India and other by which the claim of the petitioner rejected without considering actual fact of the matter, after calling entire record from the respondents.
b. To issue order of direction commanding to the respondents to release the entire service benefits admissible allowances and the pay for the period the petitioner illegally ousted from his services for which applicant is entitled by counting the entire length of service for a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
