SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 5022

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Manish Garg, Member (J), Anand S Khati, Member (A)
Pradeep Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board – Respondent
O.A. No.2639/2021



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Nitin Pawar, Tanya Rose, Anuj Aggarwal
For the Respondents: Purnima Maheshwari, D K Singh

Mere inclusion in a wait list does not confer an indefeasible right to appointment, especially after the expiry of the stipulated validity period of the panel, and such a list cannot be used as a perennial source to fill future vacancies.

Headnote:(A) Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Section 19 - Recruitment - Wait-listed candidates - Validity period of select panel - Appointment - Applicants sought appointment against vacancies arising after the expiry of the notified result panel - Tribunal held that mere inclusion in a wait list does not confer an indefeasible right to appointment - Panel cannot be operated beyond its specified validity period, nor can it serve as a perennial source of appointment for future vacancies. (Paras 4.3, 4.4)

Facts of the case:
The applicants were included in the wait list for the post of Craft Instructor Welder (Gas & Electric) pursuant to a result notice dated 28.01.2020, which specified that the panel would remain valid until 27.01.2021. After the expiry of this validity period, the applicants filed the present application seeking appointment against vacancies that arose subsequent to the non-joining of earlier selected candidates.

Findings of Court:
The Tribunal found that the recruitment panel clearly stipulated a fixed validity period that had expired. It held that the policy governing the selection process did not allow for the automatic extension of the panel, nor could the wait list be used to fill vacancies arising after the expiry date. Consequently, the reliance on prior circulars and case laws was not applicable to the facts of this case, and the application was dismissed.

Issues: Whether wait-listed candidates have an enforceable right to be appointed against vacancies arising after the expiration of the select/waiting panel's validity period.

Ratio Decidendi: Mere inclusion in a wait list does not confer an indefeasible right to appointment, and a waiting list cannot be operated beyond its stipulated validity period to fill future or subsequently arisen vacancies.

Result: Original Application dismissed.

Table of Content
1. factual background regarding recruitment panel validity. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments concerning wait-list entitlement and panel expiration. (Para 3)
3. court's finding that wait-list validity cannot be extended to future vacancies. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)

ORDER (ORAL)

Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J)

M.A. No.3269/2021 (Joining Together) is allowed and the applicants are permitted to pursue the OA jointly.

O.A. No. 2639/2021

In the present Original Application filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicants seek the following reliefs:-

“i) set aside the impugned Result Notice No. 1012 dated 28.01.2020 issued by the Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board (DSSSB), the respondent No.1 herein, to the extent it provides that the wait list panel shall be valid up to 27.01.2021;

(ii) declare that the candidate who has joined (as welder) is unqualified, i.e. does not fulfill the requisite essential qualifications, for appointment on the post of Craft Instructor Welder (Gas & Electric) (Post Code: 99/14) in the Department of Training & Technical Education, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, and, accordingly set aside his/her appointment letter/strength order dated 28.01.2021;

(iii) direct the respondents to fill all the unfilled vacancies, out of total 07 vacancies, for the post of Craft Instructor Welder (Gas & Electric) (Post Code: 99/14) in the Directorate of Training & Technical Education, Govt. of NCT of Delhi as advertised by the Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board (DSSSB) vide Notice/Advertisement No. 01/14 dated Nil;

(iv) direct the Respondent No.I i.e. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board (DSSSB) to provisionally select the applicants and consider the candidature of the applicants herein and thereafter appoint the applicant on the post of Craft Instructor Welder (Gas & Electric) (Post Code: 99/14) in the Department of Training & Technical Education, Govt. of NCT of Delhi with all the consequential benefits (monetary as well as non- monetary) thereof including seniority, full back wages/salary, etc.;

(v) cancel the candidature of the provisionally selected candidates by DSSSB having Roll No. 4100000206, 4100000106, 4100000282, 4100000040 and 4100000342 as they do not possess the requisite/essential qualification required for the post;

(vi) allow the present application with cost m favor of the applicant; and

(vii) issue any other order or direction as this Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice and in the favor of the applicants.”

2. The present matter pertains to the appointment to the post of Craft Instructor Welder (Gas & Electric) under the Directorate of Training and Technical Education.

2.1 At the outset, learned counsel for the applicants submits that the grievance in the present Original Application relates to non-consideration of the applicants for appointment despite their inclusion in the select/wait list. It is submitted that Applicant No. 1 belongs to the OBC category (placed at Serial No. 1 in the wait list), whereas Applicant No. 2 is a UR candidate (placed at Serial No. 5 in the wait list).

2.2 It is not in dispute that the result for the post of Craft Instructor Welder (Gas & Electric) was issued on 28.01.2020 vide Result Notice No. 1012, wherein it was declared that the select panel/waiting list in respect of UR/OBC categories shall remain valid up to 27.01.2021. It is also not in dispute that a supplementary result was declared on 16.03.2020, wherein the validity of the panel/wait list was again clearly stipulated to remain in force up to 27.01.2021. Learned counsel emphasizes that, both in the main result as well as in the supplementary result, the same validity period was prescribed.

2.3 Learned counsel for the applicants further draws attention to the fact that certain selected candidates did not join, and their candidature was cancelled on 02.03.2021. It is argued that vacancies thus arose due to non-joining of selected candidates

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top