SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 5042

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M. Swaminathan, Judicial Member, M.L. Srivastava, Administrative Member
B.Subhash Pareek – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
O.A./959/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Thirumalai Rajagopal
For the Respondents: Mr. J. Vasu

Similarly situated employees entitled to notional pay fixation w.e.f. 01.01.1996 under 5th CPC upgradation, with actual benefits from 21.04.2004; prior judgments in rem mandate parity, delay not bar for recurring pay claims.

Headnote:(A) Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Section 21 - Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 1997 - 5th Central Pay Commission - Upgraded pay scales for Inspectors (Rs.6500-10500) and Superintendents (Rs.7500-12000) - Applicant sought notional fixation w.e.f. 01.01.1996 and actual monetary benefits from that date, challenging limitation and discrimination - Tribunal held pay fixation recurring cause of action, delay not fatal; judgments in rem extend to similarly situated employees; directed notional fixation w.e.f. 01.01.1996 and actual benefits from 21.04.2004 with consequential arrears and pensionary benefits within two months. (Paras 21, 30-32, 40)

(B) Article 14 of Constitution - Equality - Similarly situated employees in revenue departments entitled to uniform pay scale upgradation; separate anomaly committees unnecessary under common department; fence-sitters not barred where parity mandated and department implemented similar orders. (Paras 6, 32-34)

(C) Limitation - Section 21(3) - No condonation needed for recurring pay/pension claims; subsequent judicial implementations and anomaly committee reports (22.09.2023) provide basis post-prolonged litigations. (Paras 30-31)

Facts of the case:
Retired employee challenged rejection of revised pay scale benefits w.e.f. 01.01.1996, citing precedents from Tribunal Benches, High Courts, Supreme Court dismissals, and anomaly committee recommendations implemented for others; respondents raised delay under Section 21, fence-sitter doctrine, and in personam nature of prior orders.

Findings of Court:
Refix pay w.e.f. 01.01.1996 notionally per Revised Pay Rules,1997; grant actual monetary benefits from 21.04.2004 with arrears and pensionary benefits; complete within two months. OA allowed, no costs.

Issues: Entitlement to notional pay fixation w.e.f. 01.01.1996 vs. actual from 21.04.2004; applicability of limitation; parity with similarly situated employees; in rem vs. in personam effect of precedents.

Ratio Decidendi: Prior judgments operate in rem for parity under Article 14; pay anomalies rectified retrospectively entitle notional benefits from 01.01.1996; delay inapplicable to recurring claims where department implemented similar reliefs without challenge; no discrimination in uniform application across revenue arms.

Result: OA allowed.

Table of Content
1. applicant's claim for revised pay scales from 01.01.1996. (Para 1 , 2)
2. precedents support notional pay fixation from 01.01.1996. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
3. respondents argue delay, laches, and limitation bar claim. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
4. historical litigation and anomaly committee resolutions. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
5. equality demands uniform benefits for similarly situated employees. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37)
6. notional pay from 1996, actual from 2004 granted. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41)

(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. M. L. Srivastava, Member(A))

In the instant OA, the applicant seek the following relief:

“(i) To call for the records of the Respondents and to set aside the Letter No. GCCO/II/39/54/2022-CCA Estt dated 29.08.2023 passed by 1st respondent and declare that the Applicant herein is entitled to the benefits of revised/ replaced pay scale/ upgraded pay scale of Rs. 6500-10500 for the period he was working as Inspector of Central Excise and of Rs.7500-12000 in respect of his service as Superintendents of Central Excise/Customs with effect from 1.1.1996 on actual basis, the date when the 5th CPC became operational, based on the judgments / decisions of the Supreme Court and various High Courts and Tribunals as detailed above and as has been granted to the employees of other departments of various Ministries under the Union of India;

(ii) To appropriately modify the action/order of the Respondents vide letter F.No.6/37/98-IC dated 21.4.2004 to the extent it limits the actual benefits of the revised pay scale/upgraded pay scale by granting the same w.e.f. 21.4.2004 and not granting the benefits with effect from 1.1.1996 which is arbitrary, illegal and discriminatory. (iii) To call for the records of the Respondents and to set aside the letter File No. GCCO/II/39/54/2022-CCA ESTT dated 29.8.2023 as the same are without any justifiable reason and non-speaking.

(iv) To direct the Respondents to grant benefits of revised pay and allowances to the Applicant from 1.1.1996 on actual basis;

(v) To grant and pay consequential arrears of pay and allowance for the period from 1.1.1996 to 20.4.2004, to issue revised Pension Payment Orders accordingly and also the post-retirement benefits to, along with appropriate and applicable interest per annum;

(vi) To direct the Respondents to pay the cost of the litigation to the Applicant as he has been deliberately dragged to the Tribunal by the Respondents; and (vii) To issue appropriate directions or orders which the Tribunal deems fit, just and proper in the circumstance of the case to meet the ends of justice.”

2. The brief facts of the case as submitted by the applicant are as follows:

The applicant has preferred this Original Application with many reliefs, mainly for the entitlement of benefits of revised / replaced pay scale / upgraded pay scale of Rs. 6500-10500 for the period he was working as Inspector of Central Excise and of Rs.7500-12000 in respect of his service as Superintendents of Central Excise/Customs with effect from 1.1.1996 on actual basis, the date when the 5th CPC became operational joined the department retired from respondent department as Superintendent are Inspectors, Superintendents, Assistant Commissioners and Deputy Commissioner (serving and retired officers) from various Central Excise, GST and Customs Commissionerate's in Tamil Nadu and Puducherry. The Applicant is claiming that the denial of financial benefits, specifically arrears of pay and allowances, is arbitrary, illegal, and discriminatory. The Government Resolution enforces the scales of pay recommended by the 5th Central Pay Commission (CPC) from 01.01.1996. However, the Applicant asserts that he has been denied these benefits. This Tribunal had previously allowed three Original Applications, OA No.1407/2015, OA No.1607/2015 & OA No.1608/2015, granting the revised pay scale arrears from 01.01.1996. This

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top