Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M. Swaminathan, Judicial Member, M.L. Srivastava, Administrative Member
B.Subhash Pareek – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's claim for revised pay scales from 01.01.1996. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. precedents support notional pay fixation from 01.01.1996. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. respondents argue delay, laches, and limitation bar claim. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. historical litigation and anomaly committee resolutions. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 5. equality demands uniform benefits for similarly situated employees. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 6. notional pay from 1996, actual from 2004 granted. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. M. L. Srivastava, Member(A))
In the instant OA, the applicant seek the following relief:
“(i) To call for the records of the Respondents and to set aside the Letter No. GCCO/II/39/54/2022-CCA Estt dated 29.08.2023 passed by 1st respondent and declare that the Applicant herein is entitled to the benefits of revised/ replaced pay scale/ upgraded pay scale of Rs. 6500-10500 for the period he was working as Inspector of Central Excise and of Rs.7500-12000 in respect of his service as Superintendents of Central Excise/Customs with effect from 1.1.1996 on actual basis, t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
