Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
R. N. Singh, Member (J), Sanjeeva Kumar, Member (A)
Chandan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicants are retired npti directors (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. undisputed facts of pay scale revision and impugned orders (Para 4) |
| 3. applicants argue delay, natural justice violation (Para 5) |
| 4. respondents justify recovery due to erroneous grant (Para 6) |
| 5. npti autonomous; dg granted higher pay scales validly (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 6. impugned orders based on mop advice post-audit (Para 12 , 13) |
| 7. precedents bar retrospective pension reduction post-retirement (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 8. impugned orders quashed; consequential benefits granted (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
O R D E R
Hon’ble Mr. R. N. Singh, Member (J): -
By way of the present O.A., filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicants, in paragraph 8 of the OA, have prayed for the following reliefs: -
“(i) That the Hon’ble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to pass an order of quashing the impugned order dated 17.10.2012 (Annex. A/1) and consequential orders dated 10.11.2022 (Annex. A/2) declaring to the effect that the whole action of the respondents deciding to reduce the pension of the applicants after their retirement is totally illegal, arbitrary and against the principle of natu
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
