SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 5049

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M. Swaminathan, Judicial Member, M. L. Srivastava, Administrative Member
V. Annamalai – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
O.A./1250/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Dr. K. Manoharan
For the Respondents: Mr. Su Srinivasan, SCGSC.

Similarly situated employees entitled to notional pay fixation w.e.f. 01.01.1996 under 5th CPC parity, actual benefits from 21.04.2004; Art.14 mandates uniform treatment.

Headnote:(A) Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 1997; Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - S.21; Constitution of India - Art.14 - 5th Central Pay Commission - Pay scale upgradation for Inspectors/Superintendents in Central Excise/CBIC from Rs.5500-9000 to Rs.6500-10500 and Rs.6500-10500 to Rs.7500-12000 - Notional fixation w.e.f. 01.01.1996, actual benefits from 21.04.2004 per OM dated 21.04.2004 and Anomaly Committee recommendations - Entitlement based on parity with CBDT employees post Special Anomaly Committee (CBDT letter 22.09.2023) - Challenge to rejection order dated 12.08.2025. (Paras 2, 21, 24, 40)

(B) Equality and parity - Similarly situated employees must be treated alike; judgments in rem apply to all, not in personam. No discrimination under Art.14 by denying benefits granted to others. Fence-sitters not barred if recurring cause like pay fixation. (Paras 32, 34, 35)

(C) Limitation - S.21 Administrative Tribunals Act does not bar where anomaly rectification and parity claims arise from ongoing pay/pension issues. (Paras 30-31)

Facts of the case:
Applicant, retired Inspector/Superintendent (joined 1982, promoted 1997), sought notional pay fixation w.e.f. 01.01.1996 per 5th CPC upgradation, consequential arrears/pension; rejected vide order 12.08.2025 despite precedents favouring parity with CBDT/CBIC employees.

Issues: Entitlement to notional pay w.e.f. 01.01.1996; limitation/delay; personam vs rem application of judgments; parity with other departments.

Findings of Court:
Applicant similarly situated; benefits granted per precedents (Hyderabad OA 1089/2019, Telangana HC WP 10490/2024, SC SLP 59005/2024); no separate anomaly committee needed for CBIC under Dept of Revenue.

Ratio Decidendi: Uniform treatment mandatory under Art.14; accepted precedents binding on department; notional from 01.01.1996, actual from 21.04.2004 with arrears/pension. (Paras 26-28, 34, 40)

Result: OA allowed; impugned order set aside; refix pay, grant benefits. (Para 41)

Table of Content
1. reliefs sought for retrospective pay upgradation. (Para 1 , 2)
2. precedents support notional fixation w.e.f. 01.01.1996. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 12)
3. respondents argue limitation and no parity. (Para 13 , 14 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
4. background of anomaly committee and precedents. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
5. parity under art.14; oa allowed with directions. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41)

(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. M. L. Srivastava, Administrative Member)

This OA has been filed by the applicant seeking the following relief:

(i) To call for the records of the respondents and to declare that the applicant herein is entitled to the benefits of revised pay scale with effect from 01.01.1996 on actual basis, i.e., from the date when the 5th CPV became operational, based on the judgements/decisions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court and various High Courts and Tribunals and to set aside/quash the speaking order in File No. GCCO/III/24/51/2025, CAO - O/o Pr.CC-CGST- Zone-Chennai, dated 12.08.2025 of the Principal Chief Commissioner of GT & Central Excise, TN &

Puducherry, Chennai (ii) To direct the respondents to grant benefits of revised pay and allowances to the applicant from 01.01.1996 till the time of his retirement on actual basis (iii) To grant and pay consequential arrears of pay and allowances for the period from 01.01.1996 to the date of his retirement (iv) To issue revised Pension Payment Order accordingly and to grant and pay the pension arrears and post-retirement benefits along with 18% interest per annum to the applicant as the applicant is a retired government employee of the respondent department (v) To direct the respondent to pay cost of the litigation to the applicant as the applicant has been deliberately dragged to the Tribunal by the respondent and (vi) To issue appropriate directions or orders which this Tribunal deems fit, just and proper in the circumstances of the case to meet the ends of justice”.

2. Brief facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant:

The Applicant joined the department on 20.05.1982 as Inspector and was promoted as Superintendent on 29.08.1997. The Applicant retired after attaining superannuation. During the period from 01.01.1996, the applicant was working as Inspector of Central Excise and was drawing his pay and allowance in the pay scale of Rs.1640-60-2600-75-2900. From 29.08.1997, he was working as Superintendent and was drawing his pay in the pay scale of Rs.200-30-2300-75-3200. On implementation of 5th pay commission, the pay scale of Inspector of Central Excise was initially fixed in the pay scale of Rs.5500-175-9000 and the pay scale of Superintendent in the pay scale of Rs.6500-200-10500 effective from 01.01.1996. After acceptance of anomaly in the pay scales, the Union Government refixed in the pay scale of Rs.6500-10500 and Rs.7500-12000 respectively vide Ministry of Finance OM F.No.6/37/98-IC, dated 21.04.2004, giving effect prospectively from 21.04.2004, and not w.e.f 01.01.1996 as it should have been. Therefore, the applicant submitted his representation dated 24.06.2025 requesting to consider upgrading of his pay scale from 5500 - 9000 to Rs.6500-10500 w.e.f 01.01.1996 and his pays cale from Rs.6500-10500 to Rs.7500-12000 w.e.f 29.08.1997 on actual basis and to sanction & pay the consequential arrears of pay and allowances. The same was rejected by a speaking order dated 12.08.2025. The subject issue had already attained finality and this issue is no more res integra and so, the CBIC, Department of Revenue, New Delhi vide letter F.No.A- 23011/44/2024-Ad-A, dated 10.06.2025 accepted and agreed to implement the orders of Hon’ble High Court and CAT orders. Hence the present OA, challenging the rejection order.

3. The learned Counsel for the applicant invited our attention to the common order dated 09.01.2024 passed by the Hyderabad Bench of the Tribunal in OA No. 1089/2019 & batch, which was up

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top