Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M. Swaminathan, Judicial Member, M. L. Srivastava, Administrative Member
V. Annamalai – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. reliefs sought for retrospective pay upgradation. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. precedents support notional fixation w.e.f. 01.01.1996. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 12) |
| 3. respondents argue limitation and no parity. (Para 13 , 14 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. background of anomaly committee and precedents. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 5. parity under art.14; oa allowed with directions. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. M. L. Srivastava, Administrative Member)
This OA has been filed by the applicant seeking the following relief:
(i) To call for the records of the respondents and to declare that the applicant herein is entitled to the benefits of revised pay scale with effect from 01.01.1996 on actual basis, i.e., from the date when the 5th CPV became operational, based on the judgements/decisions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court and various High Courts and Tribunals and to set aside/quash the speaking order in File No. GCCO/III/24/51/2025, CAO - O/o Pr.CC-CGST- Zone-Chennai, dated 12.08.2025 of the Principal Chief Commissioner of GT & Central Excise, TN &
Puducherry, Chennai (ii) To direct the responden
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
