Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Chhabilendra Roul, Member (A), Rajveer Singh Verma, Member (J)
Manish Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Controller General of Patents, Designs & Trade Marks (CGPDTM) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant seeks stay of transfer order. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. transfer violates spouse policy and rotational tenure. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. transfers incident of service; no right to posting. (Para 8) |
| 4. mechanical rejection of representations without reasons. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. require reasoned orders on individual employee difficulties. (Para 13 , 14) |
ORDER (ORAL)
1. The present OA has been filed by the applicant under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 seeking the following relief:
“Pending final disposal of the present Original Application, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Tribunal may kindly be pleased to:
(a) Stay the operation, implementation and effect of the impugned Transfer Order dated 09.01.2026, bearing No. No. CGPDTM- 11018(11)/1/2022-CGPO/2340, whereby the Applicant has been transferred from Delhi to Kolkata;
(b) Restrain the Respondents from relieving the Applicant from his present posting at the Delhi Patent Office, during the pendency of the present OA;
(c) Pass such other or further interim orders as this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.”
2. The learned counsel for the applicant states that the a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
