SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 5155

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Ajay Pratap Singh, Judicial Member
Mahipal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
O.A./405/2024



Advocates:
For Applicant:Sh. Ranjit Sharma, Advocate
For Respondents: Sh. Rajeev Kumar, Senior Central Govt. Counsel

Sanction/release of posts prior to NPS notification (22.12.2003) constitutes 'notified for recruitment' under OM dated 03.03.2023, entitling post-01.01.2004 appointees to switch from NPS to Old Pension Scheme despite delayed public advertisement.

Headnote:(A) Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 (now 2021) - Coverage under Old Pension Scheme instead of National Pension System - Department of Pension and Pensioners’ Welfare OM dated 03.03.2023 - Employees appointed after 01.01.2004 against posts/vacancies notified for recruitment prior to 22.12.2003 (NPS notification date) entitled to one-time option to switch to CCS (Pension) Rules - 'Notified for recruitment' includes sanction/release of posts by competent authority vide letter dated 28.07.2003 directing recruitment action, preceding public advertisement - Date of public advertisement (7-13 Feb 2004) irrelevant if notification/release preceded NPS date - Fault/delay in advertisement issuance by employer cannot prejudice employees’ rights - Similarly placed employees from same vacancy pool granted OPS benefits - Violation of Articles 14 & 16 remedied by directing coverage under OPS. (Paras 1, 13-25)

(B) Interpretation of 'advertised/notified' - Distinct terms in OM: 'Advertised' means public announcement (e.g., Employment News); 'Notified' means formal declaration/release of vacancies by authority initiating recruitment process - Sanction letter releasing 530 posts for direct recruitment and non-availability certificate prior to 22.12.2003 constitutes 'notification' under para 4 of OM dated 03.03.2023. (Paras 16, 20, 24)

Facts of the case:
Employees appointed as Store Keepers/Assistant Store Keepers pursuant to advertisement dated 7-13 Feb 2004 against 530 civilian posts sanctioned/released vide letter dated 28.07.2003 for years 2000-2001/2001-2002 - Posts covered under NPS due to joining after 01.01.2004 - Options exercised under OM dated 03.03.2023 rejected relying on advertisement date post-NPS notification - Similarly placed recruits from same vacancy pool via earlier advertisement (Dec 2003) granted OPS.

Findings of Court:
Impugned rejection orders quashed - Applicants entitled to OPS coverage - Serving employees to switch to GPF-cum-Statutory Pension Scheme; retired employees brought under OPS - Process to complete within 12 weeks.

Issues: Whether release of posts vide letter dated 28.07.2003 constitutes 'notified for recruitment' prior to 22.12.2003 entitling NPS-covered employees (joined post-01.01.2004) to OPS option under OM dated 03.03.2023, despite later advertisement.

Ratio Decidendi: Letter releasing posts for recruitment prior to NPS notification qualifies as 'notified'; employees cannot suffer for employer's advertisement delay - Parity with similarly placed employees upheld; OM para 4 interpreted to favour OPS eligibility when process initiated pre-NPS.

Result: Original Application allowed.

Table of Content
1. party details and respondents listed (Para 1 , 2)
2. vacancies sanctioned pre-nps, ads post-nps (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 10)
3. respondents deny ops due to post-nps advertisement (Para 8 , 9)
4. applicants argue vacancy notification date governs (Para 11 , 12)
5. om 03.03.2023 allows ops for pre-22.12.2003 notifications (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
6. prior judgments uphold pre-nps vacancy notification (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
7. parity with similarly placed employees under article 14 (Para 25)
8. applicants entitled to ops coverage (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33)

O R D E R

AS PER AJAY PRATAP SINGH, MEMBER JUDICIAL:

THE ISSUE

1. The issue involved in this case is whether the applicants have vested legal right for coverage under Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules instead of NPS though appointed after 01.01.2004 against posts or vacancies notified-released for recruitment prior to 22.11.2003, the date of notification for NPS or 01.01.2004 but the advertisement published after 01.01.2004?

THE PRAYER

2. Applicants have invoked jurisdiction of this Tribunal under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking following main relief [as extracted from the OA] reads as -

“This Hon’ble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to

(a). direct the respondents to grant Old Pension to the applicants, quashing orders dt.20-10-2023 (ANNEXURE A1 Colly supra);

(b) Pass such other order/s as may be deemed fit & proper.”

FACTS IN BRIEF

3. Shorn of unnecessary details, the briefly stated facts as adumbrated by the applicants in the OA and specifically not denied by the respondents in the counter reply. Applicants have stated in the OA that they were appointed on the posts of Store Keeper and Assistant Store Keeper in Air Headquarters, Indian Air Force, New Delhi, pursuant to advertisement dated 07-13 February, 2004 published in the Employment News. So also stated in the Memo of parties that Applicant Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 are working as Senior Store Superintendent, Applicant Nos. 9, 10 and 11 are working as Superintendent (Store), Applicant No.12 is working as Area Manager, Applicant No.13 as Senior Accountant, Applicant No.14 as Assistant Accounts Officer, Applicant no.15 as F&S Officer, Applicant No.16 as Assistant Auditor Officer and Applicant No.17 as Junior Accountant, whereas Applicant Nos. 18, 19 & 20 superannuated from the post of Superintendent (Store).

4. His Excellency President of India vide letter dated 28.07.2003 has conveyed the sanction for filling up 530 vacant posts of Civilians by direct recruitment in the various Air Force Units by Screening Committee for the year 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 in terms of DoP&T OM dated 16.05.2001 and for Group ‘C’ – 370 posts released out of total 530 posts released for recruitment.

5. The non-availability certificate in respect of filling up 530 posts by direct recruitment sought vide letter dated 29.10.2003 and granted vide letter dated 31.10.2023. Respondents published advertisement dated 7-13 February, 2004 (Annexure A-2) in the Employment News for the posts of Store Keeper and Assistant Store Keeper in Indian Air Force, Air H.Q., New Delhi. The applicants having been appointed pursuant to advertisement dated 7-13 Feb., 2004 for Air HQ, New Delhi were not granted benefits of Old Pension Scheme under CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 (Now 2021) whereas for the posts for Indian Air Force HQ, Maintenance Command, Nagpur to fill up out of total 530 posts sanctioned and released pursuant to same letter/notification dated 28.07.2003 has been granted benefits of Old Pension Scheme and as per OM dated 03.03.2023, granted coverage under CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 (Now 2021) in place of NPS.

6. Applicants have made specific averments in the OA that all the applicants were appointed against the posts/vacancies of 530 civilian posts sanctioned/released on 28.07.2003 and for Air HQ, respondents issued advertisement on 7-13 Feb, 2004 and for HQ Maintenance Command, IAF,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top