Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Sunil Thomas, J, Braj Mohan Agrawal, A
Harikrishnan R. – Appellant
Versus
Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges to selection process and applicant background. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. hearing and grounds of challenge outlined. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. written test mandatory only if exceeding 12 per vacancy. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. post-dm experience evaluated; essential qualification met. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. uniform evaluation reflects expert consensus, not bias. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 6. application dismissed; no interference warranted. (Para 30) |
O R D E R
Per: Justice Sunil Thomas, Judicial Member –
1.The sole applicant challenges the inclusion of respondents Nos. 5, 6 and 7 in Annexure A1 rank 1st to the post of Assistant Professor, Neurology Department, by the Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Thiruvananthapuram (hereinafter referred to as “the Institute” for brevity) and the selection process leading to it, pursuant to Annexure A6 notification.
2. According to the applicant, he passed MBBS in 1st rank in 2010 from the Mahatma Gandhi University. Thereafter, he completed MD in General Medicine in 2016. He completed post-doctoral course in Medicine with speciality in neurology in t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
