Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M. Swaminathan, Judicial Member, M. L. Srivastava, Administrative Member
N. Arunaasalam – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's service history and pay scale grievance. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. precedents support pay revision from 01.01.1996. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. claims barred by limitation and laches. (Para 13 , 14 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. historical litigation and anomaly committee formation. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 5. equality mandates benefits for similarly situated employees. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 6. notional pay from 1996, actual from 2004. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. M. Swaminathan, Judicial Member)
This OA has been filed by the applicant seeking the following relief:
(A) This Tribunal may graciously be pleased to call for records and proceedings of the case which led to issuing in the impugned letter bearing (a) F.No.A26017/50/2025-Ad.IIA, dated 04.08.2025, issued by the 1st respondent Authority (b) F. No. II/(24)/OTH/79/2025-ADMN/7371, dated 19.08.2025, issued by the 3rd respondent Authority and (c) DRI No. A-21021/05/2023-Chennai dated 28.08.2025 (A-10) issued by the 4th respondent authority and after going through their propriety, legality and constitutional validity be pleased
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
