Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Akhil Kumar Srivastava, J, Mallika Arya, A
Anand Bihari Shah – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to denial of acp for armourer post. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. armourer enjoys higher entry scale, promotional to hs. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. oa time-barred; prior oa binding. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. no discrimination; claim rejected on limitation and merits. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
ORDER
By Ms. Mallika Arya, AM
1.The applicant is challenging the legality, validity and propriety of the order dated 25.09.2015 passed by respondent No. 3, wherein it has been ordered that the post of Armourer is a promotional post of Tradesman mate (Semi Skilled) with three years regular service in the grade. Hence, there is no provision for placing them in training for two to three years in the grade. Hence, promotion of Armourer Mate to Highly Skilled grade is considered as promotion for all purposes including ACP. The applicant has submitted various representations to the respondents for grant of first ACP on completion of 12 years of service as Armourer / Mate. However, the respondents did not take any action on his representations before 25.09.2015. The respondent No. 3 issued an order on 25.09.2015 stating that the applicant is not entitled for grant of the benefit of first ACP on completion of 12
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
