Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
R N Singh, Member (J), Sanjeeva Kumar, Member (A)
Bibhav Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Government of NCT of Delhi Through its Chief Secretary – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. case details and reliefs sought (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. applicant's appointment history and disclosures (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. challenge to show cause notice and termination authority (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. respondents' contention of void ab initio appointment (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. undisputed facts and framed issues (Para 25 , 26) |
| 6. show cause notice lacked competent authority approval (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 7. pending fir not ground for termination post-disclosure (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 8. termination stigmatic requiring full enquiry (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55) |
| 9. orders set aside with limited reinstatement (Para 56 , 57 , 58) |
O R D E R
Hon’ble Mr. Sanjeeva Kumar, Member (A):
1.By way of this OA filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicant has sought the following relief(s):-
“(a) Quash and set aside the Termination Order 10.04.2024 (A-1) bearing F.No.18/4/2020/Co-terminus/GAD/Admn/3851 issued by Respondent No.3 as well as communication dated 11.04.2024 (A-1B);
(b) To quash and set aside the Show Cause No
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
