Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Suchitto Kumar Das, Administrative Member, Diwakar Singh, Judicial Member
Ajay Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant challenges disciplinary proceedings on procedural grounds. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. violations of natural justice and bias allegations raised. (Para 3) |
| 3. respondents defend ample opportunities and certified documents provided. (Para 4) |
| 4. judicial review limited to natural justice and procedural compliance. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 5. certified copies suffice when originals unavailable. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 6. retired officers competent as inquiry officers. (Para 10) |
| 7. inquiry must halt pending bias petition; rejection order reasoned. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 8. post-bias petition inquiry set aside; proceedings resume from 14.07.2021. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
O R D E R
Per Hon’ble Mr. Suchitto Kumar Das, Administrative Member :
1. The applicant has approached this Tribunal under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 praying for the following relief(s):
“a) To set aside and quash impugned Charge Memorandum No. SER/P- HQ/GAZ-CON/410/AK/20/MJR/1205 dated 17.07.2020 issued by the General Manager and Disciplinary Authority, South Eastern Railway, served under a covering letter dated 20.07.2020.
b) To set aside and quash impugned letter No. SER/P-HQ/GAZ- CON/410/AK/20/MJR/1205 dated 11.08.2020
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
