SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 5442

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
1338/2025


1. The applicant is aggrieved that he has not been offered appointment in lieu of their acquired land.

2. Brief facts of the case are that land of the applicant area 0.070 hectare, part of Khasra No.7/2, total area 0.100 hectare was acquired by the Railways for construction of Rewa-Sidhi-Singrauli Railway line and an award to this effect was passed on 04.04.2018 (Annexure A-4). As per policy of the respondents in respect of acquisition of land and providing employment to affected/dependents, the applicant being affected person, submitted his candidature for employment along with all requisite documents. But nothing has been heard by the applicant. Hence, this Original Application has been filed.

3. The respondents have stated in their reply that in Clause 11 of the notification issued on 14.10.2016, it was clearly mentioned that the policy will be subject to change in the policy letter issued by the Railway Board from time to time. The Ministry of Railways subsequently vide RBE No.193/2019 dated 11.11.2019 has decided to withdraw the earlier policy of offering appointment in Railways to affected land losers and circular issued in this regard stands superseded after issua

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top