Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Akhil Kumar Srivastava, Judicial Member, Mallika Arya, Administrative Member
Todal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Chairman cum Managing Director, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's service history and cgit reinstatement as temporary mazdoor. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. applicant's claim for regularization and pension post-10 years service. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. respondents' defence citing uma devi and no regularization scheme. (Para 5) |
| 4. supreme court precedents distinguish irregular long service warranting regularization. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. directions for regularization, pay fixation, and pension from 1989. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
O R D E R
Delivered by Mrs. Mallika Arya, AM.-
1.In the present original application, the applicant is seeking direction to the respondents to regularize his services with all consequential benefits including arrears of pay, increments, promotion/financial upgradations and terminal benefits.
2. As per the OA, the applicant was initially engaged on 01.06.1986 as casual labour in the office of SDO (T), Mandla. His services were dispensed with vide notice dated 30.12.1989 (Annexure A-1). Thereafter, the applicant raised an industrial dispute before Central Government Industrial Tribunal and vide award dated 18.05.2001 (Annexure A-3), the respondents were directed to reinstate him in service as he had acquired temporary status b
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
