Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
,
1830/2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicants explain delay due to financial hardship and covid exclusion. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondents contest delay lacking sufficient cause and concealment. (Para 3) |
| 3. applicants argue covid benefit and financial crunch justify condonation. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. respondents emphasize excessive delay for compassionate claim. (Para 7) |
| 5. court notes second litigation, defers compassionate issue to merits. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 6. sufficient cause found; delay condoned per n. balakrishnan ratio. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
In the present case, the applicant No.1 is praying for family pension as a legally wedded wife of the deceased employ and applicant No.2 is praying for compassionate appointment. The aforesaid prayer is turned down by the respondents vid order dated 28.06.2019 (Annexure A-1). Therefore, the present OA has been filed. Since there is delay in filing the present case and, therefore, the application for condonation of delay has been filed by the applicants with an explanation that in the year 2023, they felt that they finally could initiate the proceedings before this Tribunal. However, they realized that the Advocate who had been handling their matters previously,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
