O R D E R

PER HON’BLE JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR OJHA, MEMBER (J)

Heard learned counsel for the review applicants on delay condonation application and perused the records.

2. Through MA No. 2927 of 2025, review applicants have prayed for delay condonation in filing of the review application.

3. Learned counsel for the review applicants relied upon the judgment passed by Hon’ble High Court of judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench in Writ-A No. 5564 of 2023-Surendra Kumar vs. Union of India and other whereby the Hon’ble High Court has held that Tribunal can condone the delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, if it is satisfied that sufficient cause for not preferring an application within the time has been supplemented.

Learned counsel for the review applicants argued that Tribunal created under the Administrative Tribunals Act-1985 is not covered by the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter of The Property Company (P) Ltd. vs. Rohinten Daddy Mazda dated 07th January, 2026.

Further submitted that this Tribunal sometimes holds the power of Civil Court, hence, power to condone the delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 is vested in it.

Further contended