CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Sangam Narain Srivastava, Member (A)
Sunita Parmod Shoriya – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Original Application No.621/2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. arguments on temporary allotment and extension rights. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 2. no right to extension of temporary accommodation. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. application dismissed; liberty to apply afresh. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
ORDER
The applicant has filed this Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following reliefs:
“8.i. This Hon'ble Tribunal may please allow this Original Application.
8.ii This Hon'ble Tribunal, Mumbai Bench may please set aside a. Order of Intimation for Vacation of Quarter No P 32/04 at SPDC Defence Colony Mankhurd issued vide Memo No 2003/115/E2B dated 22.04.2025 and letter No. 2003/190/E2B dated 10.06.2025 issued by Asst Engineer (Civil) BSO (NW) O/o Garrison Engineer (NW), Military Engineer Services Mankhurd, Mumbai
400088.
b. Recovery order No. 2011/133/E2B dated 12.06.2025 of Rs 1,80,900/(wrongly shown as Rs.32210/-) as damage rent for period of January 2025 to May 2025 issued by the Garrison Engineer (NW), Military Engineer Services.
8.iii Direct the respondents to renew the GATE PASSES of mother and husband of applicant which are going to expire on 30.07.2025
8.iv Cost of this application may kindly be allowed.
8.v Any other relief (s) as deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.”
2. Brief facts of the case are that the applicant and her husband are both Central Government employees. The applicant is working as a Upper Division Clerk (UDC) at INS Tanaji, CABS, Mankhurd. They have two daughters. Since both spouses are employed, the applicant’s mother, aged about 60 years and dependent on the applicant, resides with them.
2.2 On 29th December, 2023, the applicant was allotted Quarter No. P-38/09 in Naval Staff Quarters at SPDC Defence Colony, Mankhurd, Mumbai, situated on the fourth floor. On medical grounds concerning the applicant and her aged mother, the applicant requested both the Navy authorities as well as the Garrison Engineer, Mankhurd, for allotment of a non-MES quarter on the ground or first floor. The said request was considered, and the applicant was allotted Quarter No. P-32/04, Type-II, situated on the first floor of Government MD Accommodation at SPDC Defence Colony, Mankhurd, Mumbai, for a period of six months on a temporary basis. The applicant occupied the said quarter on
1st June, 2024.
2.3 On 14th November, 2024, the applicant requested extension of the said accommodation, as it is a common practice that such requests are generally considered, particularly when a large number of MES quarters are lying vacant. However, no action was taken on the said request. Subsequently, the Garrison Engineer issued an intimation dated 22nd April, 2025 (Annexure A-1), directing the applicant to vacate the quarter. It is submitted that several such quarters have been allotted to non-MES employees, who have been occupying them for years.
2.4 A recovery order was also issued demanding Rs. 1,80,900/- (though incorrectly reflected as Rs. 32,210/-) towards damage rent for the period from January 2025 to May 2025 by the Garrison Engineer (NW), Military Engineer Services, Mankhurd, Mumbai – 400088, vide order dated 12th June, 2025. No such recovery has been effected against similarly placed non-MES employees who continue to occupy such quarters for long durations.
2.5 The reason stated in the impugned order (Annexure A-1) is that the quarters are required for newly recruited MES staff. However, it is submitted that a substantial number of MES quarters are lying vacant, details of which have already been furnished in the Original Application.
2.6 The applicant had sought extension of the said first-floor quarter on medical grounds. In view of the availability of vacant quarters and the fact that similarly situated non-MES employees have been allowed to continue in occupation for years, the action of evicting the applicant and levying damage rent is arbitrary and illegal. There cannot be differential treatment in identical circumstances.
2.7 It is submitted tha

Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.