CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
1500/2016
O R D E R
HON'BLE Ms.V.RAMA MATHEW, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER
1.The factual matrix of the case are as under – the applicants are working as Social Security Assistants (SSA) under the 2nd respondent, attached to the offices of the 5th and 6th respondents. The 1st and 3rd applicants initially entered service as LDCs on 01.06.1993 and 25.05.1993 respectively in the Ministry of Labour, Urban Development, New Delhi and subsequently joined the 2nd respondent’s office at Thiruvananthapuram in 1995 and 1994 respectively. The 2nd applicant entered service as LDC on 31.05.1996, while the 4th applicant was appointed as LDC on 31.03.1995 on compassionate grounds.
2. At the time of their entry into service, the next promotional post was UDC with promotions governed by a 50:50 ratio of seniority and departmental examination. However, no examinations were conducted between 1997 and 2004 for filling UDC posts under the examination quota, adversely affecting the applicants’ promotional prospects and seniority. With effect from 03.01.2004, new Recruitment Rules were introduced, a copy of which is produced as Annexure A-1, abolishing the LDC cadre and redesignating UDC as SSA with enhanced qualifications in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.