SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 6249

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
1500/2016


O R D E R

HON'BLE Ms.V.RAMA MATHEW, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER

1.The factual matrix of the case are as under – the applicants are working as Social Security Assistants (SSA) under the 2nd respondent, attached to the offices of the 5th and 6th respondents. The 1st and 3rd applicants initially entered service as LDCs on 01.06.1993 and 25.05.1993 respectively in the Ministry of Labour, Urban Development, New Delhi and subsequently joined the 2nd respondent’s office at Thiruvananthapuram in 1995 and 1994 respectively. The 2nd applicant entered service as LDC on 31.05.1996, while the 4th applicant was appointed as LDC on 31.03.1995 on compassionate grounds.

2. At the time of their entry into service, the next promotional post was UDC with promotions governed by a 50:50 ratio of seniority and departmental examination. However, no examinations were conducted between 1997 and 2004 for filling UDC posts under the examination quota, adversely affecting the applicants’ promotional prospects and seniority. With effect from 03.01.2004, new Recruitment Rules were introduced, a copy of which is produced as Annexure A-1, abolishing the LDC cadre and redesignating UDC as SSA with enhanced qualifications in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top