Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rameshwar Vyas, J, Amit Sahai, Member (A)
Bajrang Lal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of the applicants' challenge against denial of 3rd macp benefits based on their promotion history. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. rationale for treating mcm placement as a financial upgradation to be offset against macp eligibility. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
..... Respondents By Advocate: Mr. K.S. Yadav ORDER Per Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rameshwar Vyas, Member (J)
Being aggrieved by non-grant of 3rd upgradation under MACP Scheme, the applicants (total in number 12) civilian employees in the cadre of artisan staff in defence establishments have preferred the joint application making challenge to that part of the order dated 11.05.2013 (Annexure-A/1) whereby some of the applicants have not been found entitled for 3rd MACP in the grade pay of Rs.4600/- and prayed for grant of grade pay of Rs.4600/- from the due date with all consequential benefits.
2. Facts of the case in brief are as under:-
2.1 The applicants herein were appointed/promoted on various posts in the skilled category. They got promotions to the post of HS-II and then HS-I. Vide order dated 20.05.2003 (Annexure-A/3), restructuring of cadre of artisan staff in defence establishments took place after getting sanction of the Presi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
