O R D E R

Justice K.Haripal, Judicial Member

1.Applicant is a former Divisional Engineer in BSNL, who retired from service on 31.05.2011. He has highlighted anomaly of his juniors getting 2^nd time bound upgradation and thereby drawing higher pay than him. His grievance is that though he made representations, that were not considered by the respondents favourably. Earlier, he had moved this Tribunal with O.A.662/2015. By order dated 20.08.2015, the Tribunal disposed of the O.A. at the admission stage itself directing the respondents to consider and dispose of his representation. By Annexure-A5 order dated 22.10.2016 that representation was rejected. Aggrieved by the same, he has approached the Tribunal seeking to quash Annexure-A4 (sic)/Annexure-A5 and set aside the same, to direct the respondents to grant him 2^nd time bound upgradation in the scale of pay in the substantive cadre of Sub Divisional Engineer and grant him benefits to the level of the pay of his juniors.

2. The applicant had started service as Junior Telecom Officer. He was promoted as Sub Divisional Engineer and then got upgradation with effect from 01.10.2004 in the scale of Rs.13000-350-18250 from the scale of Rs.1187