(Open Court)
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ALLAHABAD BENCH ALLAHABAD Allahabad this the 21st day of May, 2026 Original Application No.1055 of 2024 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Joshi, Member (Judicial)
Hon’ble Mr. Anjani Nandan Sharan, Member (Administrative)
11. Haribansh Singh, a/a 64 years, Son of Late Satya Narayan Singh, PUNIT KUMAR R/o House No. 88, Tulsi Sagar, District Ghazipur.
MISHRA
2. Rajendra Singh Yadav Son of Late Bhagwan Ram, R/o Salempur (Bhowapur), Post Office Buzurga, District Ghazipur.
3. Surya Nath Ram Son of Late Ram Dhan Ram, R/o Akalpura, Post Office- Rauja, District- Ghazipur.
4. Subash Chandra Gupta Son of Late Polhawan Ram, R/o and Post Office- Para, District- Ghazipur.
5. Virendra Prasad Ram Son of Late Gorakh Nath Ram, R/o Yusufpurganj, Mohamdabad, District- Ghazipur.
6. Lal Ji Prasad Son of Late Sarju Prasad, R/o Barwa Kala, Post Office- Sadat, District-Ghazipur.
7. Phool Chand Ram Son of Late Ram Awtar Ram, R/o Sa-2/207, C-
5 Pandeypur, Gaon Ali sokha ki Gali Varanasi Cant. District -
Varanasi.
8. Vijai Ram Son of Late Ram Naresh, R/o Village and Post Office Barwa Kala, Sadat, District -Ghazipur.
9. Smt. Satya Devi wife of Surjeet Bahadur, R/o Shastri Nagar District- Ghazipur.
10. Smt. Saraswati Devi Wife of Late Prabhu Nath Ram, R/o Akalpura, Post Office- Rauja, District-Ghazipur.
....Applicants By Advocate: Shri Kedar Nath Mishra VERSUS
1. Union of India, through its Secretary, Ministry of Communication (I & T), Sansad Marg, Dak Bhawan, New Delhi
22. Chief Post Master General UP Circle, Lucknow
33. Post master General, Varanasi Region Varanasi
44. The Senior Superintendent of Post Offices, division Ghazipur … Respondents By Advocate: Shri Chakrapani Vatsyayan
O R D E R
By Justice Rajiv Joshi, Member (Judicial):-
1.Heard Shri Kedar Nath Mishra, learned counsel for the applicants and Shri Chakrapani Vatsyayan, learned counsel for the respondents at the time of hearing.
2. The instant Original Application under Section 19 of the Central Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 has been filed by the applicants, who are 10 in numbers for the following reliefs:
(i) To issue a suitable order or direction to call for record and direct the respondents to count their services rendered as Reserve Trained Pool for purpose of granting the financial up gradation under time bound one promotion scheme and the modified assured career progression scheme the past service since initial appointment w.e.f. 15.04.1983 for purpose of pension and all other consequential benefits including seniority and pay fixation (DCRG, leave incashment, pay fixation, seniority, revised pension) and same shall be paid 12 % interest on the entire sum from the due date. ;
(ii) to issue a suitable order or direction to the respondents to count service since initial appointment for benefit of TBOP after complete of 16 years service and pay in higher scale.
(iii) To issue a suitable order or direction to the respondents to count the service since initial appointment for purpose of benefit of MACP.
(iv) to issue a suitable order or direction to pay the same salary and emoluments per mensem as are being received by postal assistant with effect from the date of their appointment and pay arrears.
(v) to pass such other and further order as this Hon’b le Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
(vi)Yo award cost of the O.A. in favour of the applicants.
3. The brief facts as stated in the Original Application is that the applicants participated a selection process during the existence of a Scheme call as Reserve Trained Pool (hereinafter referred as RTP Scheme). The applicants were selected for the post of Reserve Trained Pool Postal Assistant in Ghazipur Division vide different orders. The appointment of the applicants were made as provisional basis and as such, the applicants completed all the required conditions as per Notification dated 13.10.1982 and after verification, they joined as Postal Assistant. The applicants also completed prescribed training and thereafter joined the duties as Postal Assistant. Subsequently, all the applicants were regularized as Postal Assistant on different dates between 1987 to 1989. However, their services as RTP before regularization, have not been counted by the respondents for any service benefits including career progression.
3.1 The applicants were superannuated from services after attaining the age of superannuation on different dates from Ghazipur Division from the post of Postal Assistant and other posts, save and except applicant-10, who is widow of late Prabhu Nath Ram, who died in harness on 20.04.2013, but their initial services as RTP prior to regularization have not been counted for service benefits. Some similarly situated persons approached the various Bench of this Tribunal from time to time and the Tribunal has allowed the claim of similar situated persons in those Original Applications. The applicants also represented before the respondents, but no heed was paid. Hence, this Original Application has been filed.
4. On the other hand, counter reply was filed on 07.10.2025, wherein it has been stated that all the applicants were initially appointed as RTP in Postal Department in between 1983-84. Subsequently, they were regularized in 1987. It is very pertinent to mention here that Department vide letter no. 60/36/80-SPB-II dated 30.10.1980 had introduced RTP scheme for Postal Assistant and Sorting Assistant in Postal and RMS Divisions with a view to ensure smooth flow of work in operative offices, which at times was hampered due to absence and other causes and meeting with staff shortage with overtime arrangement was not found to be a satisfactory solution.
4.1 As
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.