Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Harvinder Kaur Oberoi, Member (J), Sumeet Jerath, Member (A)
Vinod Bansal – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corporation Of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's challenge to the denial of retrospective promotion. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. respondent's contentions regarding dpc procedures and vigilance status. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. court's findings on the validity of prospective promotion and dpc process. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Ms. Harvinder Kaur Oberoi, Member (J):
The present Original Application has been filed challenging the impugned Order dated 06.10.2023 issued by the Respondent, Municipal Corporation of Delhi, whereby the Applicant was promoted from the post of Junior Engineer (Civil) to Assistant Engineer (Civil) only prospectively and was denied retrospective promotion and consequential seniority from the date of occurrence of vacancy or from the date of his ad-hoc promotion. The name of the Applicant appears at Serial No. 189 of the impugned order. It is the case of the Applicant that the sole ground for denying him retrospective promotion was the alleged pendency of departmental proceedings, which subsequently stood quashed by judicial orders and, therefore, could not have been relied upon to deny him promotional benefits.
2. It is submit
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
