Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member, Sanjiv Kumar, Administrative Member
Tapan Das – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant challenges dismissal period pay restrictions following initial reinstatement order. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. allegation of discriminatory treatment compared to similarly situated employees regarding back-pay. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. court grants relief based on parity with previously decided identical cases. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
ORDER
PER: SANJIV KUMAR, MEMBER (A):
This O.A. has been filed by the applicant seeking the following reliefs:
8.1. To set aside the impugned speaking order bearing no. AN/IB/D/139/T. Das/Volume IV dated 21-04-2021 (Annexure-A/4) issued by the Controller of Defence Account, Udayan Vihar, Narengi, Guwahati in respect of the penalty imposed upon the applicant.
8.2. To set aside the order bearing No. Part II O.O. No.-354 dated 16-11-2021 (Annexure-A/9) issued by the Deputy Controller of Defence Account, Udayan Vihar, Narengi, Guwahati whereby decided that the period of absence from duty from the date of dismissal from service to the date preceding the date of rejoining after reinstatement i.e. from 29-05-2017 to 29-04-2021 shall be treated as period not spend on duty as he was not fully exonerated from the charges and
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
