Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member, Sanjiv Kumar, Administrative Member
Veer Mohan Mandal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's request for noc and subsequent resignation rejection. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding the right to resign versus operational exigencies. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. staff shortage is not a valid ground to withhold resignation. (Para 8 , 9 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. distinction between technical resignation and ordinary resignation regarding past service benefits. (Para 10 , 13) |
| 5. quashing of rejection order and direction to accept resignation. (Para 14 , 16) |
ORDER
PER MR. SANJIV KUMAR, MEMBER (A):
The instant O.A. has been preferred by the applicant seeking the following relief(s):
“8.1 The Hon'ble Tribunal be pleased to direct the respondent no. to issue No Objection Certificate(NOC) to the applicant for submission before the respondent no. 4 for appointment to the post of Technician Grade III under RRB CEN No. 02/2024, with all consequential benefits including appointment and counting of his past service w.e.f. 01.05.2023 for all purposes.
Or alternatively
to direct the respondent no. 2 to accept the resignation submitted by the applicant on 01.05.2025 with a further direction upon the respondent no. 4 to consequently complete the selection process and appoint the a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
