Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member, Sanjiv Kumar, Administrative Member
Ashish Das – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant seeks to resign to accept a higher position after being refused nocs by the respondent railways. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. parties contest the validity of resignation refusal based on staff shortage versus the right to resign. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. administrative orders rejecting resignation must provide reasons; staff shortage is not a valid ground to prevent resignation. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. impugned orders quashed; respondents directed to accept resignation without past service benefits. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
ORDER
PER MR. SANJIV KUMAR, MEMBER (A):
The instant O.A. has been preferred by the applicant seeking the following relief(s):
8.1. Impugned order dated 06.02.2025 (Annexure A1) as well as impugned order dated 04.08.2025 (Annexure A2) be set aside and quashed so far the applicant is concerned.
8.2. The Hon'ble Tribunal be pleased to direct the respondents to accept the technical resignation of the applicant submitted on 01.08.2025 and release him immediately to join the post of Technician-III/Tele immediately pursuant to offer of appointment letter dated 17.07.2025(Annexure ) issued by the Railway Recruitment Bo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
