Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Ranjana Shahi, Judicial Member, Lok Ranjan, Administrative Member
Anil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of facts regarding employment status and termination. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. conditions for deemed confirmation of probationers. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. requirement of inquiry for non-stigmatic termination. (Para 9) |
| 4. applicability of orders despite citation of wrong legal provisions. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. final outcome of the application. (Para 15 , 16) |
ORDER
Per: RANJANA SHAHI, JUDICIAL MEMBER
The present Original Application has been filed by the applicant praying for the following reliefs: -
(i) By an appropriate order or direction, the impugned order dated 17.05.2018 and letter dated 04.08.2018 be quashed and set aside and the respondent be directed to re-instate the applicant in service with all consequential benefits.
(ii) Any other order, direction or relief may be passed in favour of the applicant which may be deemed fit, just and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case.
(iii) That the costs of this application may be awarded.”
2. The brief facts of the case, as stated by the applicant, are that he was initially appointed on the post of Bootmaker w.e.f. 01.04.2015 vide appointment letter dated 23.03.2015 in Temporary Capacity against
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
