Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajiv Joshi, Member (Judicial), Manju Pandey, Member (Administrative)
Paramanand Chaurasia – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural background leading to the cancellation of candidate's application. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. counter-arguments regarding technical glitches vs established recruitment procedures. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. judicial validation of disciplinary action based on handwriting forensic evidence. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
O R D E R
By Justice Rajiv Joshi, Member (Judicial):-
1. Heard Mr. Parth Pandey, holding brief of Shri Namit Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Arun Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the respondents at the time of hearing.
2. The instant Original Application under Section 19 of the Central Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 has been filed by the applicant for the following reliefs:
(i) Issue an order or direction in the nature of quashing the impugned order dated 18.05.2020 passed by the Member Secretary, Railway Recruitment Board, Allahabad, which is contained in Annexure-1 to this Original Application.
(ii) Issue an order direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent-2 to issue appointment letter in pursuance of the Advertisement dated 03.02.2018 and to sent the applica
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
