SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 6748

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
9746/2019


O R D E R

By Hon’ble Mr. Rajveer Singh Verma, Member (J) :-

1.The applicant was initially appointed as a Field Assistant in the Central Silk Board on 17.09.1991 and was later promoted to the post of Technical Assistant on 01.08.2003. She got married in the year 1994 to a person belonging Scheduled Caste community. She filed a complaint to the Police against her two senior officers for harassing her sexually on 25.08.2005. Shortly thereafter, the department initiated disciplinary proceedings against her, issuing a Charge Memo in June 2006 that alleged she had made a false complaint of harassment, misrepresented her caste status, and engaged in unauthorized money lending. Learned counsel for the applicant asserted that the subsequent inquiry was biased inasmuch as the venue was moved from Dehradun to Ranchi, which effectively stripped her of the ability to present witnesses or defend herself. Furthermore, the department did not constitute a proper committee headed by a woman to investigate the harassment claims, despite legal requirements as made in the case of Vishaka and others Vs. State of Rajasthan AIR 1997 SC 3011 and recommendations from the National Commission for Women vide let

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top