Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Sanjeeva Kumar, Member (A), Ajay Pratap Singh, Member (J)
Amiya Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Secretary Revenue Govt of India Ministry of Finance – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background involving various oas challenging ict policy withdrawal. (Para 1 , 4 , 8) |
| 2. determination of whether applicants possess a vested right to claim ict and absorption. (Para 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 9) |
| 3. recruitment rules framed under article 309 supersede executive instructions. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. executive authority can withdraw prior circulars and policy decisions. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. binding precedent of s.k. naushad rahaman holding that there is no fundamental right to transfer. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 6. dismissal of oas based on established legal principles and lack of vested rights. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
1. O.A. No. 2045/2024
1. Amiya Kumar,
Serving as Tax Assistant, Group 'C', Aged About 33 Years, S/o Sh. Arun Kumar, R/o B-37, Income Tax Quarters, Income Tax Office, No. 3, Gandhi Road, Salem-636007.
2. Manoj Kumar,
Serving as Tax Assistant, Group 'C', Aged About 36 Years, S/o Sh. Dhani Ram, R/o C-25, Income Tax Quarters, Income Tax Office, No. 3, Gandhi Road, Salem-636007.
3. Rahul Singhal,
Serving as Tax Assistant, Group 'C', Aged About 32 years, S/o Sh. Dinesh Chand Singhal, R/o A-10
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
