Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Urmita Datta Sen, Judicial Member, Anindo Majumdar, Administrative Member
Alak Pal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural background and history of applicant's seniority claims. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. respondents' justification for non-entitlement to career advancement. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. applicant's rejoinder regarding promotion and seniority discrepancies. (Para 6) |
| 4. judicial finding on eligibility for consequential seniority benefits. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
O R D E R
Ms. Urmita Datta (Sen), Judicial Member:
Since both the applicants share a common interest and common cause of action, they are taken up together and Order passed in this O.A. will govern the O.A. No. 350/00947/2025 also.
2. For the sake of brevity facts are delineated from O.A. No. 958/2025.
The applicant in O.A. No. 958/2025 has filed the instant Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 praying for the following relief:-
“a) An Order do issue directing the respondents
to grant the benefit of selection Grade w.e.f.
01.01.18 in favour of the applicant at par
with his junior R.L. Shukla, Respondent No.
5 & Uttam Majumdar, Respondent No. 6 and
to grant all consequential benefits with
arrears.”
3. The applicant appeared in the selection test for promotion to the post of AEN (Group – B) throu
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
