Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member, Ram Mohan Johri, Administrative Member
Prithvi Raj Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's claim for notional increment based on completed service year prior to retirement. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. respondent's defense regarding delay, laches, and strict interpretation of retirement date under fr 56(a). (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. judicial determination that earned increments cannot be denied for pensionary purposes despite retirement timing. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 17 , 20) |
| 4. operational directives for notional pay fixation, pension revision, and regulation of pension arrears. (Para 16 , 18 , 19 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
ORDER
Per: - Ram Mohan Johri, Administrative Member
1. The applicant has filed the present Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following reliefs: -
a) To direct the respondents to grant notional increment to the applicant with effect from 01.01.1998 for the service rendered by him from 01.01.1997 to 31.12.1998 and consequentially re-fix his pensionary benefits and also to pay the arrears of pension to the applicant.
b) Any other relief which this Hon'ble Tribunal deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
2. The applicant has filed the pr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
