SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL

PRINCIPAL BENCH: NEW DELHI

C.P. No. 408/2018 in

O.A. No. 3692/2015

The 21st day of December, 2018

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY, CHAIRMAN

HON’BLE MR. K.N. SHRIVASTAVA, MEMBER (A)

Mahavir Prasad Sharma,

Aged about 64 years,

R/o H.No.163, Street-15, Pratap Nagar,

Mayur Vihar-1, Delhi-110091.

(Ex-EEG Technician, KSCH Hospital)

.. Petitioner

(By Advocate : Shri Yogesh Kumar Mahur )

Versus

1. Dr. Rajeev Garg, Director

Lady Hardinge Medical College & KSCH,

New Delhi.

2. Ms. Preeti Sudan,

Secretary,

Ministry of Health and Family Welfare,

Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi.

.. Respondents

(By Advocate : Shri R.K.Sharma)

ORDER (ORAL)

By Justice L. Narasimha Reddy, Chairman

The applicant filed OA No. 3692/2015 ventilating his

grievance about denial of retiral benefits. The OA was allowed

on 12.07.2017 directing the respondent to release the leave

encashment, gratuity, regular pension within a period of three

2

C.P. No. 408/2018 in

O.A. No. 3692/2015

months from the date of receipt of that order. Interest @ 9%

was also awarded on arrears of pensionary benefits. This

Contempt case is filed alleging that the respondents did not

pay interest on pensionary benefits.

2. We heard learned counsel for the applicant and the

learned counsel for the respondents.

3. The case has undergone several adjournments. Today

learned counsel for respondents filed a compliance memo,

together with certain enclosures. It is also stated that a sum

of Rs.2,50,315/- was released to the applicant towards

payment of interest.

4. There is no dispute that other amounts such as pension,

gratuity and leave encashment were released to the applicant.

Interest is paid now. Hence, the order passed by the Tribunal

stands complied with. We, however, make it clear that if the

applicant is of the view that if any further amount is due to

him, towards interest, it shall be open to him to claim the

same through appropriate proceedings. The Contempt case is

accordingly closed. Notices are discharged.

(K.N.Shrivastava )

(Justice L.Narasimha Reddy)

Member (A)

Chairman

‘sd’

3

C.P. No. 408/2018 in

O.A. No. 3692/2015

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top