SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL

PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI

C.P. No. 808/2017

O.A No. 3352/2013

This the 21st day of December, 2018

Hon’ble Mr. V. Ajay Kumar, Member (J)

Hon’ble Ms. Aradhana Johri, Member (A)

Sh. Sonu Kaushik

S/o. Late Sh. Ved Prakash Kaushik

R/o. H. No. 465, Mohalla Maharam,

Shahdara, Delhi – 32.

...Petitioner

(By Advocate : Mr. Ajesh Luthra)

Versus

1.Sh. Amulya Patnaik

Commissioner of Police,

PHQ, MSO Building IP Estate, New Delhi.

2.Sh. Alok Kumar,

Addln. Commissioner of Police,(Crime & Railway)

PHQ, MSO Building, IP Estate, New Delhi.

3.Sh. R. A. Sanjeev

D.C.P (Establishment), PHQ, MSO Building,

IP Estate, New Delhi.

...Respondents

(By Advocate : Mr. Amit Anand)

ORDER (ORAL)

Mr. V. Ajay Kumar, Member (J) :

When this matter is taken up for hearing, learned

counsel for respondents while producing an order dated

14.12.2018 in W.P. (C) No. 13506/2018 of Hon’ble High

Court of Delhi filed against the orders of this Tribunal

2

C.P. No. 808/2017

where under the Hon’ble High Court observed that the

Tribunal shall not proceed with the contempt proceedings,

prayed for the disposal of the C.P.

2.

In the circumstances and in view of the order

passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi, the Contempt

Petition is closed and the notices are discharged. However,

the applicant is at liberty to avail his remedies in

accordance with law, once the W.P. (C) is finally decided or

the stay is vacated.

(Aradhana Johri) (V. Ajay Kumar)

Member (A)

Member (J)

/Mbt/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top