Back
2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 15200
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member, Mallika Arya, Administrative Member
Chandra Shekhar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Original Application No.200/00988/2026
Important Points
Subject
Service Law - MACP
Headnote
Issues: Whether the respondents should be directed to decide the pending appeal regarding the grant of MACP-II benefits.
Legal Category Hierarchy
-
administrative law
-
service law
- financial upgradation schemes
- departmental remedies and appeals
-
service law
-
practice and procedure
- litigation and disposal
For the Appellants/Petitioners: R K Shukla
For the Respondents: S P Singh
O R D E R
By Mallika Arya, AM:
Through this Original Application, the applicant is seeking benefit of grant of MACP-II after completion of 10 years of service after MACP-I.
The counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant had filed representation dated 06.06.2024 (Annexure A/1) for grant of MACP-II but the same has been rejected by the respondents vide order dated 20.06.2024 (Annexure A/2). Thereafter he has filed appeal to respondent no. 2 but it has not been decided till date. He submits that the applicant will be satisfied if the respondents be directed to decide his appeal in a time bound manner.
The counsel for the respondents has no objection if this Original Application is disposed of in above terms.
Accordingly, this Original Application is disposed at the admission stage with direction to the respondents to decide the appeal filed by the applicant dated 18.09.2026 (Annexure A/3) by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
The applicant is directed to provide a copy of the order of this Tribunal along with the copy of Original Application to the competent authority.
