Back
CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Shri Jishnu Barua, Chairperson, Shri Ramesh Babu V., Member, Shri Harish Dudani, Member, Shri Ravinder Singh Dhillon, Member
M/s NILE Limited – Appellant
Versus
Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Limited (APTRANSCO) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition details and parties involved. (Para 1 , 3 , 6) |
| 2. background and procedural history of the case. (Para 7 , 9) |
| 3. respondent's submissions and defenses. (Para 8 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. legal basis of claims and counterclaims. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 5. issues identified for adjudication. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 6. final decision and order of the court. (Para 35 , 42) |
| 7. detailed examination of financial claims. (Para 36 , 38) |
आदेश/ ORDER
The Petitioner, M/s NILE Limited, is engaged in the business of wind power generation and has set up a non-conventional energy project, i.e., a 2 MW capacity wind farm at Ramagiri, Anantapur District. The project achieved commercial operation on 30.08.1995. Initially, the power generated from the project was captively consumed by the Petitioner company, after paying the wheeling charges under the Power Wheeling Agreement dated 21.07.1995, entered into with the erstwhile APSEB. APERC initiated proceedings and passed Orders dated 20.06.2001 in O.P. No.1075 of 2000, and also orders dated 20.03.2004 in R.P. No. 84 of 2003 in O.P. No. 1075 of 2000. APERC fixed tariff of Rs. 3.37 per unit from 01.04.2004. The Petitioner agreed to supply power
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
