SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CERC) 160

CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Jishnu Barua, CJ, Ramesh Babu V., Member, Harish Dudani, Member, Ravinder Singh Dhillon, Member
Power Grid Corporation of India Limited – Appellant
Versus
Madhya Pradesh Power Management Company Limited – Respondent
Petition No. 150/TT/2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri Mohd. Mohsin, Shri Vishal Sagar, Shri Arjun Malhotra, Shri Ashish Alankar, Ms. Ashita Chauhan
For the Respondents:

The court emphasized the need for rigorous justification of delays and their impact on capital costs, while allowing tariff adjustments based on permissible expense regulations.

Headnote:(A) Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulations, 1999; Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions of Tariff) Regulations, 2019 - Petition by a Transmission Licensee for approval of transmission tariff for a specific period - The assets involved pertain to the conversion of non-switchable line reactors into switchable ones. The Commission found that the petitioner had appropriately justified the commercial operation dates despite time overruns due to uncontrollable factors including supply chain disruptions and weather-related delays. The petition was partially condoned on time overruns while setting the annual fixed charges according to submitted claims and stipulated regulations. (Paras 1-113)

Facts of the case:
The case involved a petition by the Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. to determine transmission charges following the conversion of 240 MVAr line reactors at Raipur Pooling Station into switchable reactors. Delays and additional costs were due to various uncontrollable events, including global semiconductor shortages and severe weather conditions.

Findings of Court:
Approval of new commercial operation dates with specific causes for delays acknowledged; partial allowance of costs related to Interest During Construction (IDC) and additional capital expenditures (ACE). Annual fixed charges set for the 2019-24 period with a specific calculation basis.

Issues: Main issues included the justification for charging higher transmission tariffs due to delays, the calculation of capital costs, and the determination of annual fixed charges.

Ratio Decidendi: The Commission ruled on the need for complete documentation of claims for additional expenses, clarified that uncontrollable delays should be substantiated and handled according to regulations, and noted the importance of timely project execution to avoid tariff complications.

Result: Approval granted with certain conditions.

ORDER

The Petitioner, Power Grid Corporation of India Limited (PGCIL), has filed the instant Petition for the determination of transmission tariff under the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions of Tariff) Regulations 2019 (hereinafter referred to as “the 2019 Tariff Regulations”) for the period from the COD to 31.3.2024 in respect of the following assets (hereinafter referred to as “the transmission assets”) under “Western Region Expansion Scheme-XXIV (WRES-XXIV)" (hereinafter referred to as “the transmission project”) in the Western Region:

Asset-1: Conversion of 240 MVAr Non-switchable Line reactor at Raipur Pooling Station (associated with Raipur Pooling Station-Champa Pooling Station 765 kV Ckt-1) into Switchable Line reactor along with NGR bypass arrangement; and

Asset-2: Conversion of 240 MVAr Non-switchable Line reactor at Raipur Pooling Station (associated with Raipur Pooling Station-Champa Pooling Station 765 kV Ckt-2) into Switchable Line reactor along with NGR bypass arrangement.

2. The Petitioner has made the following prayers in the instant Petition:

“1) Approve the DOCO as claimed in the instant petition and condone the time over run.

2) Approve the Transmission Tariff for the tariff block 2019-24 block for the assets covered under this petition, as per para7 above.

3) Admit the capital cost as claimed in the Petition and approve the Additional Capitalization incurred/projected to be incurred.

4) Allow the petitioner to recover the shortfall or refund the excess Annual Fixed Charges, on account of Return on Equity due to a change in applicable Minimum Alternate/Corporate Income Tax rate as per the Income Tax Act, 1961 (as amended from time to time) of the respective financial year directly without making any application before the Commission as provided in Tariff Regulation 2019 as per para 8 above for respective block.

5) Approve the reimbursement of expenditure by the beneficiaries towards petition filing fee, and expenditure on the publishing of notices in newspapers in terms of Regulation 70 (1) Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions of Tariff) Regulations, 2019, and other expenditure (if any) in relation to the filing of the petition.

6) Allow the petitioner to bill and recover Licensee fees and RLDC fees and charges, separately from the respondents in terms of Regulation 70 (3) and (4) Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions of Tariff) Regulations, 2019.

7) Allow the petitioner to bill and adjust the impact on Interest on Loan due to a change in the Interest rate on account of the floating rate of interest applicable during the 2019-24 period, if any, from the beneficiaries.

8) Allow the Petitioner to bill and recover GST on Transmission Charges separately from the respondents if GST on transmission is levied at any rate in the future. Further, any taxes including GST and duties including cess, etc. imposed by any statutory/Govt./municipal authorities shall be allowed to be recovered from the beneficiaries.

9) Allow interim tariff in accordance with Regulation 10(3) of Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions of Tariff) Regulations, 2019 for the purpose of inclusion in the PoC charges. and pass such other relief as the Commission deems fit and appropriate under the circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice.”

Background

3. The brief facts of the case are as under:

a. The transmission project was agreed upon to in the 3rd Consultation Meeting for Evolving Transmission Schemes in Western Region (CMETS-WR) held on 31.1.2022. The transmission project was later taken up for approval in the 8th NCT meeting held on 25.3.2022, wherein it was decided that the conversion of 2x240 MVAr non-switchable line reactors at Raipur Pooling Station (associated with Raipur Pooling Station-Champa Pooling Station 765 kV Ckts-1 and 2) into Switchable line reactors along with NGR bypass arrangement (earlier proposed as part of WRES-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top