Back
CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Shri Jishnu Barua, Chairperson, Shri Ramesh Babu V., Member, Shri Harish Dudani, Member, Shri Ravinder Singh Dhillon, Member
Mumbai Urja Marg Limited – Appellant
Versus
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's background and security interest creation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. hearing and submissions by parties. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. court's analysis on security interest and licensing. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. legal requirements for assigning licenses. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. conclusion and order of the court. (Para 25 , 26) |
ORDER
The Petitioner, Mumbai Urja Marg Limited (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Petitioner/ MUML’), has been granted a transmission licence under Section 14 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) to establish the “Western Region Strengthening Scheme- XIX (WRSS-XIX) and North Eastern Region Strengthening Scheme- IX (NERSS-IX)” (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Transmission System’ or ‘Project’), the details of which are specified in the schedule attached to the licence issued vide order dated 1.4.2021 in Petition No. 599/TL/2020. Further, vide Order dated 1.4.2021 in Petition No. 561/AT/2020, the Commission adopted the competitively discovered levelized tariff of Rs. 2565.92 million per annum for the Project.
2. The Petitioner has filed the present Petition for approval
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
