Back
CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Jishnu Barua, Chairperson, Ramesh Babu V., Member, Harish Dudani, Member, Ravinder Singh Dhillon, Member
Jhajjar Power Limited – Appellant
Versus
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of power plant and petition. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. procedural history and prior orders. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. petitioner's prayers and hearing summary. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. petitioner's water charges increase claims. (Para 7) |
| 5. respondents' limitation and merits objections. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 6. trader and beneficiary responses. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 7. framed issues for adjudication. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 8. petition not barred by limitation. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 9. change in law definition under ppas. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 10. railway events qualify as change in law. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 34 , 35) |
| 11. water charges not change in law. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 12. notice requirements complied with. (Para 32 , 33) |
| 13. no in-principle approval for future costs. (Para 36) |
| 14. entitlement to recovery and carrying cost. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 15. ppa amendments by state commission. (Para 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 16. petition disposed with directions. (Para 44) |
ORDER
Jhajjar Power Limited (JPL) owns and operates a 1,320 MW coal-based thermal power plant comprising two units of 660 MW each at Jhajjar, Haryana, supplying power to the State of Haryana and the National Capital Territory (NCT) o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
